Oh, we gave grants to a couple of 'make your own landing pad on arrival at the Moon or Mars" projects at NASA's Innovative. Short term? Serious cost and delay amid a forehead=slapping "D'uh!" Plausibly very good news for Artemis and bad news for SLS, but those are separate matters) (The fact that the 1st stage kept chugging and climbing and trying, despite that, is incredible! People, we have a rocket! Just 6 months with no where to send it from!). And a pretty blatant first guess theory is that some of those chunks hit rocket engines, likely explaining why at least six went out or flickered during launch. No diverter trench, no suppression water jets, etc, only a concrete base that got blasted into clouds of smithereens by the mightiest rocket ever made by this species. Someone insisted that 60 years of NASA + ESA experience with LAUNCH PADS could be ignored. It's clearly "Stage Zero" that was the Big Mistake. Okay mixed news about the SpaceX partial success+spectacular RUD. My Pillow boss Mike Lindell to pay $5m to man over bogus election claim Well, A COUPLE of you have and reported good results. It not only can work, I've tested it for close to ten years and it ALWAYS works, in at-minimum searing their macho bluster to ashes as they flee in screeching terror.Īnd no one will try it. and now Lindell who made the macho dare himself and now must pay up! a lawsuit is essentially a forced wager over facts. Several times THIS WEEK we have SEEN THE PRINCIPLE IN ACTION! Fox fleeing in panic from accountability for its lies. Make it about MONEY! If there's anything they care about more than even their machismo it is their cash. There IS a way to nail the topic to a specific, falsifiable assertion and to make em terrified re adjudication by peerless judges. "Fact checking" fails because it can be shrugged off as its own incantation and anyway, they always move on to the next cult mantra. every fact-using profession and even the very notion that facts are things. Incited by a world feudalist putsch, this cult - as predicted by Mark Twain and Robert Heinlein - wages open war vs. I've yammered for a decade about the efficacy of WAGER DEMANDS to confront the masturbatory incantation fetishes of today's confederate madness. And it is the one method that not a single AI maven will look at, or will even acknowledge. It is the same one we have used for 300 years. Here I address the moratorium concept while answering the "AI Dilemma" TED talk by two smart guys who can see problems, but make disastrous recommendations. and then says "the only way to fix it is 'bad dog!'." Followed by an admission that "in fact that method does not work." SO? What does that have to do with a completely futile and absurd 'moratorium'? He asks the right questions. But GPT will be able to FEIGN sentience plausibly and pass Turing Tests - they'll even fool me by December, I am sure. Yes, these GLLM models cannot be 'sapient' by their very nature, as he - and Stephen Wolfram - says. And he shows zero sign of comprehending history - the last 300 years of other crises triggered by new info techs - or what's possible in the future. Prof Russell is very smart and knows a lot, like most of the petition signers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |